ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02834
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) for the Calendar Year
2009C (CY09C) Major (Maj) Central Selection Board (CSB) be
Reconsidered for Definite Promote (DP).
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on
14 Jul 11. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances
surrounding the applicants request, and the rationale for the
earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings,
with Exhibits, at Exhibit M.
By DD Form 149, dated 30 Jan 12, the applicant requests his PRF
for the CY09C (CSB) receive reconsideration for a DP.
In support of his appeal, applicant provides copies of his
Officer Preselection Brief, Promotion Recommendation Forms,
Officer Performance Report, and documents extracted from his
military personnel records related to his matter.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit N.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. After careful consideration of the applicants
reconsideration request and the documentation he submitted, we do
not find the evidence presented is sufficient to override the
Board's original decision. Although the applicant believes his
opportunity for receiving a DP was impacted due to the issues
with his security clearance, after a thorough review of the
applicants latest submission, we do not find the documentation
presented and the applicants assertions sufficient to conclude
that his PRF is an inaccurate representation of the his promotion
potential or that it was not rendered in good faith based on the
information available at the time. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
2. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s)
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-02834 in Executive Session on 29 Jan 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining was considered:
Exhibit M. Record of Proceedings, dated 1 Aug 11, w/Exhibits.
Exhibit N. DD Form 149, dated 30 Jan 12, w/atchs.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02834
Although, the applicant contends his Senior Rater omitted several items from the PRF, he has failed to provide documentation to prove this or submitted a reaccomplished PRF with support from the Senior Rater and the MLR President. The Senior Rater does not support the applicant’s request to change the report or upgrade the PRF to a “Definitely Promote” Recommendation. The complete AFPC/DPSIDEP evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY1997 | BC 1997 01068 4
His records, to include the corrected DP be considered for promotion by an SSB for the CY93B Major CSB. On 31 March 1997, the applicant submitted an appeal to the Board requesting his non-selections to the grade of major by the CY93B and CY94A CSBs be voided, his PRFs for both promotion boards be revised to reflect overall recommendations of DP, and he be promoted to the grade of major by the CY93B CSB with all rights, benefits, pays, and entitlements restored. With his letter of...
In summary, no senior rater, no MLRB President, no central selection board, and no -special selection board has ever reviewed his CY90 (1 year BPZ)"records that included the revised CY89 ( 2 year BPZ) PRF. Based on the SRR review of his PO589 PRF and subsequent upgrade, the applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by SSB for the CY89A Board. Based on upon a senior rater review (SRR) of his previous CY89 (1 5 May 89) lieutenant colonel...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04690
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04690 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. vxHis Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) rendered on him for the Calendar Year 2010B (CY10B) Major Central Selection Board (CSB) be rewritten by his new wing chaplain. He be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-1999-03088a
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1999-03088 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for the Calendar Year 1995A (CY95A) Major Central Selection Board (CSB) be declared void and replaced with a PRF reflecting an overall recommendation of “Definitely Promote...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01060
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: It took significant time to get his officer performance report (OPR) and his promotion recommendation form (PRF) corrected, which diminished his chances for promotion by the Calendar Year 2003 (CY03) Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) Special Selection Board (SSB). Therefore, he feels the SSB process prejudices his IPZ record as an officer passed over several times, as well as the effects of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01060
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: It took significant time to get his officer performance report (OPR) and his promotion recommendation form (PRF) corrected, which diminished his chances for promotion by the Calendar Year 2003 (CY03) Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) Special Selection Board (SSB). Therefore, he feels the SSB process prejudices his IPZ record as an officer passed over several times, as well as the effects of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 01311 4
On 27 Jul 12, the applicant was notified that on 14 May 12, he was considered, but not selected for promotion by the P0604C (Chaplain) SSB (Exhibit Q). By a letter dated 1 Aug 13, the applicant is requesting reconsideration for his request for direct promotion to the grade of colonel with an effective date of 7 Dec 04, or in the alternative SSB consideration for promotion to colonel based on the reaccomplished OPR and PRF provided by his rater. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00323
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to remove his N-O PRF for the PO513A CSB and replace it with an updated version, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Once a file is accepted for record, only strong evidence to the contrary warrants correction or removal from the record. While the Board notes the applicants letter of support from the ACC/CC, we believe it would be inappropriate for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00606
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00606 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Material errors contained on his Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF), prepared for the P0503A Central Selection Board, be corrected; the final line of Block IV, be changed to reflect “- Personifies leadership! ...